HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY
Human Duty
The meaning of Human responsibility is actually human duty. Jesus
Christ has said:
Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s
and to God the things that are God’s
Luke 20: 25
This same advice has been given by the Prophet of Islam in these words:
Give to the rulers what is due to them.
And ask your dues from God.
Sahih Bukhari
BOTH these sayings show us the right relationship between individual
and society. A healthy relationship between an individual
and society can only be established when the individual possesses
the spirit of responsibility. When this is so, then the focus of the
individual will be on his responsibility. The individual will so desire that
he should fulfil the rights of society that are on him.
A healthy relationship between individual and society can
only be established when the individual possesses
the spirit of responsibility.
As to the rights of the individual, they are not achieved by demanding
them, rather they must be achieved through personal effort by making
use of the resources available. This spirit of responsibility is the
guarantee that there is no conflict between society and the individual.
The development of both society and the individual will then continue
with these healthy efforts.
Mature Mind
Art of rejection is easy, which only a great mind can accept.
Acceptance is a phenomenon of maturity.
HAPPINESS OTHER NAME FOR CONTENTMENT
A State of Mind
HAPPINESS is the cherished goal of every human being. But, it is
a fact that the majority of people fail to achieve happiness. They
begin their day with unhappiness and end it with unhappiness.
It is a sad aspect of almost every human being. So, what is the solution
to this widespread problem?
This phenomenon can be explained by applying the well-known formula:
‘It is in comparison that we understand’. Animals are also like human
beings, but all animals live in happiness. The word “unhappiness” is
not found in the dictionary of animals. What is the reason behind this
difference? It is because animals always live in contentment. They are
satisfied with whatever they get, be it more or less.
The secret of happiness is in contentment. If you are
living in contentment, then you will be happy.
This phenomenon tells us that the secret of happiness is in contentment.
If you are living in contentment, then you will be happy. But if you are
discontent with what you have achieved, then you are bound to live in
a state of unhappiness.
Studies show that there are two levels of achievement: one based on
need and the second based on greed. As far as need is concerned, no
one is deprived of it in this world. But, the pursuit of greed has no limit.
No amount of achievement can satisfy one’s greed. It is this nature of
man that makes him unhappy.
Everyone should be very practical in this matter. Every person must
differentiate between the achievable and the unachievable. Fulfilling
one’s need is achievable for anyone, but fulfilling greed is undoubtedly
unachievable for everyone, even for a wealthy person possessing
political power.
Trying to satiate one’s greed is an unlimited phenomenon, but those
items after which one becomes greedy are limited. Man by nature is Mr Unlimited, but the world in which he lives is a limited world. It is this
difference that leads to the phenomenon that is called unhappiness.
Both happiness and unhappiness are states of the mind. If you are
aware of this fact, you will easily be able to manage your ambitions and
instantly achieve happiness. Happiness is an internal phenomenon, it
is not an external achievement.
Man is searching for happiness outside of him in the
external world, although happiness lies within him,
in his state of mind.
Acharya Rajneesh was an Indian mystic guru. He wrote a book with
the title, Kundalini Andar Base. This title is based on a story of the musk
deer. When it smells the odour of its musk, it runs here and there in
search of the source of the fragrance, although it is actually coming
from within itself. The same is true regarding happiness. Man searches
for happiness outside of him, although happiness is inside him.
Following the above expression, one can say: ‘Happiness andar base’, or
happiness dwells inside you.
Happiness is everyone’s greatest desire, but everyone fails to achieve
happiness. Why is this so? Because, man is searching for it outside of
him in the external world, although happiness lies in his inner world,
that is, his state of mind. Make your state of mind healthy and you will
certainly attain happiness.
Honeybee-Style Living
Live like a honeybee. Extract what is
good for you and leave what is
unwanted for you.
Do not waste your time in
complaint and protest.
LIVING IN THE GREAT BLESSINGS OF GOD
Eternal Obligation
THE Quran refers to God’s three special blessings for man in these
words: “He created man out of a [mere] drop of sperm: yet he
shows himself to be openly contentious! He has created cattle
for you: from them you derive food and clothing and numerous other
benefits; how pleasant they look when you bring them home in the
evenings and when you take them out to pasture in the mornings. They
carry your loads to places which you could otherwise not reach without
great hardship—surely, your Lord is compassionate and merciful—He
has created horses, mules and donkeys, so that you may ride them,
and also so that they may be put on show, and He creates what you do
not know.” (
Acknowledging divine blessings inculcates a positive
personality in a person, and it is this positive personality
that will be held deserving of being settled in Paradise.
These verses refer to three blessings which in the entire universe have
only been given to man. Man should acknowledge these blessings
and give the appropriate response to them. It is this response by a
man that will be mainly responsible for gaining him a seat in Paradise.
Acknowledging these divine blessings inculcates a positive personality
in a person, and it is this positive personality that will be held deserving
of being settled in Paradise.
The first blessing is that God created man and gave him a unique
personality. This kind of personality is an exceptionally rare gift to man.
Nothing in the universe shares this gift.
The second blessing is given here in terms of the modes of transport,
or in other words, means of communication. This is a symbolic blessing.
It refers to all those blessings which have been given to man in the
form of the life-support system, both in the form of movable and
immovable things.
The third blessing is mentioned in these words: “He creates what you
do not know.” This third blessing was referred to here as a prediction.
When in the seventh century the Quran was revealed this blessing had
not come into existence, it was to appear in the future. This blessing is
the industrial civilization which was present in nature in the potential
sense at the time of the revelation of the Quran. After a long process
of a thousand years this blessing became a reality and we now know it
as the civilization produced by the industrial and scientific revolution.
Acknowledgment means deep appreciation of a gift. This
kind of acknowledgment is the greatest human quality.
God Almighty is the giver of these blessings and man is the recipient.
What is required of man is to consciously acknowledge these
blessings, without any compulsion. Acknowledgment means deep
appreciation of a gift. This kind of acknowledgment is the greatest
human quality. It shapes the entire personality of a human being. It is
this acknowledgment that makes a person a positive person.
The above Quranic verses call man to discover the bounties of God
Almighty and respond to them with a great sense of acknowledgment.
This will develop a high kind of personality in a person. It is this
personality that will prove to be a deserving candidate for Paradise in
the eternal life of Hereafter.
THE CULTURE OF PEACE Part V
Teachings of Islam
We often talk of peace in the context of war. But this is a very narrow and restricted
notion of peace. The fact is that peace is deeply linked with the whole of human
life. Peace is a complete ideology in itself. It is the master-key that opens the doors
to every sort of success. Peace creates a favourable atmosphere for success in
every sort of endeavour. Without peace, no positive action — small or big — is at
all possible.
Peace At All Costs
THE Prophet Muhammad was a great lover of peace. His opponents
repeatedly wanted to embroil him in war, but he avoided it
and stayed away from fighting with them. However, on a few
occasions, in the face of the one-sided aggression of his opponents, he
was forced to engage in defensive battles, which were of a temporary
nature. One of these defensive battles was the Battle of Badr.
At the very moment when the two armies faced each other at Badr, an
angel of God came to the Prophet. The angel told the Prophet that God
had sent him a message of salam or peace. Hearing this, the Prophet
replied that God is Peace; Peace is from Him and Peace will return
to Him.
An exalted person is one who even in the face of violence
thinks of peace, and who in the midst of war
makes plans for reconciliation.
From this incident we learn that even at the time of war the Prophet
remained a peace-loving person. Even at this moment of great
emergency, he did not allow his mind to be filled with hatred and
violence. Rather, even at this time he continued to think in terms of
peace and security. At this moment, too, his heart was heaving with
hope that, with God’s help, he could establish an atmosphere of peace
and security in the world. A true person is he who even during war
thinks of peace, and who, even during battle, harbours the hope of
peace and security in his heart.
This is no ordinary matter. Rather, it is an exalted model of positive
thinking. War is the most negative of all negative things. The Prophet
here stands at the edge of war but on his lips are words, not of bloodshed and violence, but, rather, of peace and security. This undoubtedly
reflects a very exalted character. An exalted person is one who even in
the face of violence thinks of peace, and who in the midst of war makes
plans for reconciliation.
God’s Name is Peace
The Quran mentions various names (or attributes) of God. One of
these is As-Salam, i.e. ‘The Source of Peace’. This means that God is the
epitome of peace. God loves peace and security so much that he has
kept As-Salam as one of His names.
The noted scholar Al-Khattabi writes that God is the Being from Whom
all people are safe and secure, and from Whom they experience peace,
not violence. When God’s dealings with human beings are based on
peace and security, then human beings should deal in the same way
with each other. That is to say, we should relate to each other with
peace and security, and not with severity and violence.
Who is Strong?
According to a Hadith report (Sahih Bukhari), the Prophet said that a strong
person is not one who defeats others in wrestling, but, rather, only he
who when angry, keeps his nafs or lower self under control.
When God’s dealings with human beings are based on
peace and security, then human beings should deal
in the same way with each other.
To stop one’s anger while in a state of anger is a sign of self-control.
And, self-control is, undoubtedly, the greatest power. At moments
when one is angry, self-control saves one from committing wrong
actions. Someone who lacks the power of self-control will burst out
uncontrollably when he is angry, so much so that he can easily become
violent. To keep one’s anger under control is the way of a peace-loving
person, while losing control when angry, is the way of a person who
glorifies violence.
Suppose two people have a fight; and one of them hurls the other to
the ground. This may signify only that the former is physically stronger
than the latter. However, physical strength is a very limited sort of
power. In contrast, someone who is angry but is able to control his anger and behaves in a balanced way towards the person who provokes
him is much stronger than the person who is only physically strong. His
behaviour proves that he possesses the power of intelligence, which
is undoubtedly much more powerful than physical strength. Such a
person can, because of his wise planning, win every battle without
physically harming anyone.
Formula for Social Peace
What is the ideal formula for social peace? How can balanced conditions
be established in society? In this regard, a Hadith report gives us some
valuable clues.
According to this report, the Prophet said that fitna, or strife, is asleep,
and that God’s curse is upon he who wakes up a sleeping fitna. This is
a natural formula for social peace.
The Prophet said that a strong person is not one who
defeats others in wrestling, but, rather, only he who
when angry, keeps his lower self under control.
The fact of the matter is that within every human being is a deeplyrooted
egotism. And this egotism is such that if it is provoked, it very
quickly explodes and sets off violence. However, Nature has arranged
for this egotism to be dormant within every person’s breast. It is present
inside everyone, but, in accordance with the system of Creation, it is in
a state of sleep. Under such conditions, a simple way to establish a
peaceful society is to let the egotism that lies fast asleep inside people’s
breasts remain as it is.
Only those people whose egotism has been provoked go about
disrupting social peace. If one abstains from provoking other people’s
egotism, social peace will not be ruptured. From this we learn that
establishing social peace is within our own control, rather than being
dependent on others. Through your positive behaviour you can avoid
provoking other people’s egos, and then you will certainly remain
protected from their wrath.
Do Not Confront the Enemy
In a Hadith report recorded in the Sahih al-Bukhari, the Prophet is said
to have remarked that one should not desire confrontation with one’s enemy, and that one should ask for peace from God. This means that if
someone thinks of us as his enemy, we should not react in the same way
by considering him our enemy and starting to fight with him. Rather,
despite this person’s enmity, we should seek to avoid quarrelling with
him. Even though he treats us as his enemy, we should try to avoid
fighting with him.
When, in this Hadith report, the Prophet tells us to ask God for
peace, it means that we should adopt the path of peace, rather
than confrontation, and that along with our peace-loving efforts, we
should seek succour from God. Your plea to God should not be for the
destruction of the enemy. Rather, you should ask, ‘O God! Bless me
that, despite people’s enmity, I do not take to the path of violence and
confrontation, but, instead, that I carry on with the journey of my life
walking on the path of peace.’
Establishing social peace is within our own control,
rather than being dependent on others.
From this we learn that according to the Law of Nature, peace is the
general rule, whereas violence is an exception. We also learn that if a
person or group appears to be one’s enemy, confrontation is not the
only way to respond.
A better and more effective way is to solve the problem of an enemy
through peaceful actions. The power of peace is both more effective
and also more beneficial than the power of violence.
Method of Non-Violence
According to a Hadith report (Sahih Bukhari) the Prophet said that God
gives in response to softness what he does not give to sternness. This
is a way of expressing a law of Nature that God has established in this
world. On the basis of this law, if you behave in a gentle, non-violent
way, your work will be more effective. But if you are harsh and violent,
you will not succeed, and your efforts will fail.
Whenever someone adopts the harsh and violent way, his efforts are
unnecessarily divided on two fronts: on his own inner development,
on one hand, and on fighting his external enemies, on the other. In
contrast, if someone is gentle and non-violent, it becomes possible for him to focus all his energies on just one front: on his inner development.
Consequently, he will be much more successful.
The above-mentioned Hadith report tells us about this basic law
of Nature on the basis of which the entire system of this world
functions. Whatever one obtains in this world is what one gets by
behaving in accordance with, rather than in violation of, this system.
This system of Nature is based completely on the principles of peace
and non-violence.
That is why whenever you obtain something in this world it is by these
principles. By deviating from them, you can be sure that you will get
nothing at all.
Limits of Dissension
A Hadith report (Musnad of Ahmad) relates that the Prophet declared
that the best jihad is to utter a word of truth and justice in front of
an oppressive ruler. On the other hand, in another Hadith report
(Collections by al-Bukhari), the Prophet is said to have declared that a person
who sees something in his ruler that he does not like should exercise
patience with regard to that matter. Likewise, in a Hadith report
contained in the Sahih Muslim, the Prophet is said to have declared that
one should listen to one’s ruler and obey him, even if he whips one on
one’s back and grabs one’s wealth.
Do not desire confrontation with your enemy, instead
seek peace from God. — The Prophet
These Hadith reports appear to provide two different commandments.
On one hand, we are told that if we see something wrong with our
rulers, we should openly announce it. On the other hand, we are also
told that if we see something wrong with our rulers, we should exercise
patience in that regard and that even if he oppresses us, we should
tolerate it.
These prescriptions clearly indicate the distinction between announcing
something, on the one hand, and taking action on it, on the other. It is
a desirable thing that if you see something wrong with your rulers, you
should announce it in the form of exhortation and well-wishing. But
as far as practical steps are concerned, one should completely abstain from them. One must distinguish between the politics of exhortation
and confrontation. Using the legitimate right of exhortation, one should
completely stay away from political confrontation.
It is very important to keep this distinction in mind. Whenever people
launch movements to practically confront their rulers and make plans
to push them out of power in the name of ‘reform’, it inevitably creates
a violent atmosphere in society. However, if people abstain from such
conflictual politics and remain satisfied just with verbal exhortation,
peace will always prevail and society will not degenerate into a jungle
of violence.
Peaceful Means Are Better
A Hadith report recorded in the Sahih al-Bukhari sheds light on a very
important Islamic teaching. According to this report, whenever the
Prophet had to choose between two methods with regard to any
matter, he would always choose the easier one.
The power of peace is both more effective and
beneficial than the power of violence.
If you view this choice of the easier option in the context of violent
versus peaceful methods, then it would be true to say that whenever
the Prophet was faced with any matter, then he chose peaceful, and
not violent, methods to deal with it.
However, this is not simply a matter of ease versus difficulty. Rather,
it means that peaceful methods are always efficacious, while violent
methods are always ineffective. Instead of solving a given problem,
violent methods only further exacerbate it and make it seem even more
complicated. In this regard, what the Hadith report referred to above
means by difficult method is a method through which it is difficult
to achieve one’s goal. Compared to this, by easy method is meant a
method through which it is easy and certain to attain one’s goal.
Flexibility, Not Stiffness
A Hadith report (Sahih Muslim) likens a momin, a true worshipper of God,
to a soft plant, which, whenever it is faced with a gust of wind, bends
accordingly. And when the gust goes away, the plant once again stands
up. In this way, it saves itself from troubles and difficulties. According to this Hadith report, there are two ways to face a storm. One way is to
be stiff when faced with it. The other way is to exercise flexibility; one
way of reacting is the violent way, while the other is the peaceful way.
God wants us to abstain from the former and to choose the latter.
Those who try react to a storm by adopting the method of stiffness
only show by this action of theirs that they are victims of extreme egotism.
In contrast, the path of peace is based on modesty. In this world,
those who let their egotism dictate their behaviour are bound to face
destruction, while success is for those who adopt the path of modesty.
This is expressed in the form of a Hadith report, according to which the
Prophet said that God will raise high those who behave modestly.
Peaceful Citizens
Explaining who a momin (a true believer) is, the Prophet is said to have
remarked (Ibn Majah) that people’s blood and wealth are safe from him.
God gives in response to gentleness what he does not
give to harshness. — The Prophet
There are two ways of living in any society. You can live peacefully
with others, or you can choose to keep quarreling with them. The
Hadith report referred to in this instance indicates that the way of a
true believer is to live along with others as a peaceful citizen. He lives
without creating any problem at all for other people’s life, property and
honour. Under no conditions whatsoever does he engage in violence.
How can members of a society live at peace with each other, refraining
from troubling and oppressing each other? There is one way—and
that is, despite whatever complaints against others one may have,
one should remain steadfast on the path of balance. One should bury
deep in one’s heart the complaints one has against others. One should
abstain from venting one’s ire and other negative emotions on others.
In a society that consists of people who are like this, every individual
will feel safe at the hands of everyone else. Such a peaceful society is
an ideal human society.
.....to be continued.
This article is in continuation of a series entitled ‘The Culture of Peace’
that commenced from Issue 19 (July 2014).
PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT
An Intellectual Process
EXPERIENCE shows that man is like an innocent flower bud in his
childhood. But as he reaches the age of maturity, he develops
various perversions in his personality. For example: stubbornness,
egoism, defiance etc. To develop a true personality man needs to
cleanse himself of such perversions. Personality development is done
in two ways. Man should have either preserved his nature in which he
was born or else the only other method is to remove one by one, the
artificial layers that cover his personality until his true nature emerges
in all its purity. This is in likeness to the way cattle chew cud.
Research and experiments reveal that every experience
or thought becomes a permanent part of the human mind
and in turn shapes the human personality
According to modern psychological research, it has come to knowledge
that the human mind can be divided into three major systems. These
three parts are found in every human being right from their birth.
They are:
1. Conscious mind
2. Sub-conscious mind
3. Unconscious mind
Research and experiments reveal that every experience or thought
becomes a permanent part of the human mind and in turn shapes
the human personality. Even if man tries to remove this thought or
experience from his mind he will not be able to do so.
When a thought comes in the human mind, either positive or negative,
it first appears in the conscious mind. This can also be called living
memory. After this when man sleeps at night, due to natural processes,
the thought moves from the conscious mind to the sub-conscious
mind. When this process takes place, man has only 50 percent of
conscious control over this thought. The remaining 50 percent is
beyond his control.
When he sleeps the next night, this thought travels further and reaches
his unconscious mind. At this stage, this thought is completely out of
his conscious control.
These day-to-day thoughts which appear in the human mind, develop
his personality. As the thoughts are, so will be the personality. Positive
thoughts will develop a positive personality, but if these thoughts are
negative, then his personality will continue to develop negatively. Such
being the case, a pertinent question arises as to how to develop a
positive personality.
The method of developing a positive personality is that when any
negative thought emerges in the mind of man, he ought to eradicate it
in the first instance itself. A specific process of converting the negative
aspect into positive should be undertaken.
The method of developing a positive personality is that
when any negative thought emerges in the mind of man,
he ought to eradicate it in the first instance itself.
To consider a few examples: if a person is angry but forgives immediately,
then the anger will not take the form of revenge. If the success of
others above one creates a negativity, one should immediately convert
it into acceptance; lest it turns into jealousy, becoming a part of one's
personality. With every negative thought, this corrective process
should be undertaken immediately. If there is a delay in this process,
then it would soon happen that these thoughts will reach the subconscious
mind and, after sometime, it will enter into the unconscious
mind. When this happens, it will become such an integral part of the
personality and even if man wants to detach it from his personality, he
will not be able to do so.
Generally people do not carry out this cleansing process. They pay
the price in the form of carrying a negative personality hidden behind
a civilized appearance. The negative personality is actually an evil
personality. Any man or woman who wants to save himself or herself
from such a dreadful fate must adopt the above-mentioned corrective
process in their daily life. Besides this, there is no other solution to
this problem.
FROM MAULANAS DESK
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, born in 1925, in
Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, is an Islamic spiritual
scholar who is well-versed in both classical Islamic
learning and modern disciplines. The mission of his life
has been the establishment of worldwide peace. He has
received the Padma Bhushan, the Demiurgus Peace
International Award and Sayyidina Imam Al Hassan
Peace award for promoting peace in Muslim societies.
He has been called ’Islam’s spiritual ambassador to the
world’ and is recognized as one of its most influential
Muslims
. His books have been translated into sixteen
languages and are part of university curricula in six
countries. He is the founder of the Centre for Peace
and Spirituality based in New Delhi.
NOW OR NEVER
I met an intelligent and educated young man who had developed a
bad habit due to some reason. I advised him to get rid of the habit,
saying: “This habit is constantly destroying your health, it has also
halted your intellectual development. In all aspects, it is disastrous for
you.” I advised him to urgently do something to get rid of the habit.
After a pause, he replied: “I will do it.” I said: “No, you should say, ‘I have
done it’.”
In life the principle that works is ‘now or never’. We do not have time.
‘I will do it’ is a kind of luxury which we cannot afford. We have to take
decisions at once. Every day is the last day for you, so you have to
decide in the very first moment, otherwise you cannot do anything.
Time is running fast, it does not wait for anyone.
In life the principle that works is ‘now or never’.
‘I will do it’ is a kind of luxury that we cannot afford.
I told him that the mind has an enormous capacity. There are some
windows in the mind. These windows open up only when man takes an
urgent decision. For example, if in reality you come face to face with a
cobra, you will react with great speed. The reason is that the fear of the cobra activates your mind and the result is that some of these closed
windows of your mind open up instantly.
Every human mind has this potential, but generally people utilize this
capacity of the mind only during moments of fear. A wise man is one
who can utilize this opportunity for positive planning, and opens up
the windows of his mind in normal circumstances. Fear even activates
an animal. However, what differentiates a human being from an
animal is that man should be able to activate the potentials in his
mind without fear.
Three Kind of Problems
Problems are of three kinds.
If a problem is related to the present,
you can solve it through wise planning.
If the problem is related to the past,
then a simple solution is: forget it,
and the problem will
instantly disappear.
If the problem is regarding the future,
then it is not a problem at all,
it is simply a baseless fear.
Re-plan to Succeed
When you fail in your life, take it as a result of lack of planning.
So, in such situations, try to do re-planning and
you will certainly attain success.
QURAN THE PRESERVED BOOK OF GOD
Words of God
Today I have concluded for you your religion, and I have
completed my blessing upon you, and I have
approved Islam as your religion.
THE QURAN 5:
SOME people have taken this verse to mean that previous religions
were incomplete, and that they were only made complete with
the religion of the final Prophet of Islam, Mohammed. But this
interpretation is mistaken. By ‘conclusion of religion’ in this verse is
meant conclusion of the Book of God which had been revealed to
Prophet Mohammed over a period of 23 years. This is the last verse
of the Quran to be revealed and marks the completion of the Book of
God in Arabic. The meaning of this verse is not that the religion which
God had been sending down since the beginning of human history had
gradually been developing and had now taken on its final and complete
form. Instead, it is the revelationary completion of the Quran in Arabic
that is referred to, not the evolutionary completion of divine religion
as a whole.
The Quran was the only divine Scripture to bring about a
revolution of such universal proportions that a large and
strong community gathered in support of it and ensured
that the Book of God was preserved in its original form.
There is, essentially, one Book of divine guidance. That Book has been
called Ummul Kitab (The Essence of the Book) in the Quran. The divine
scriptures were editions of this Ummul Kitab, revealed to the different
Prophets. The difference between one Scripture and another is one
of language and style. There is no question of one Scripture being
complete and another incomplete.
After the final Prophet, however, the only way to salvation is by means
of the Quran and Islam. Following previous scriptures and religions
cannot earn one salvation, now. But there is only one reason for
this: the fact that the Quran is preserved in its original form whereas
other religious scriptures are not. The Quran still exists as it was revealed, but previous Scriptures have been altered and are not now
as they originally were. This difference between the Quran and other
Scriptures is a historical fact that cannot be doubted on any academic
grounds. Clearly, only that edition of the Book of God which exists in
its original form will be a source of guidance and salvation for man.
Scriptures which have been altered by man—which do not even exist
in their original form or language—will never be able to provide man
with guidance and salvation.
How was it that the Quran was preserved whereas previous Scriptures
were not? The only reason for this is that in this world a powerful
community is required to preserve the Book of God—a community
which is able to ward off every threat to the integrity of the Scriptures.
The Quran was the only divine Scripture to bring about a revolution of
such universal proportions that a large community gathered around
it—a community that was strong enough to ensure that the Book of
God was preserved in its original form.
The fact is that the Quran is preserved in its original form
whereas other religious scriptures are not.
The scale of the revolution which the Quran brought about is
unprecedented in human history. During the Prophet’s lifetime Islam
had spread throughout the Arabian Peninsula. Within one hundred
years of the Prophet’s death his followers had subdued most of the
inhabited world. The enemies of monotheism were—on a universal
level—either obliterated or vanquished.
Islam continued to dominate the world scene, until eventually man
entered the age of the press. Now, there was no possibility of any
changes or additions being made in the Book of God. The task of
preservation of the Quran had been accomplished for all time.
WAR AND PEACE IN ISLAM
In the Light of Quran and Hadith
AN accepted principle for evaluating a system or ideology is to
differentiate between its declared principles, on one hand,
and the actual practice of the people who claim to stand for
or represent it, on the other. For example, let us consider that you
want to evaluate the role of the United Nations which was formed
in 1945. Every student of international politics knows that in order
to understand the role of the UN, he/she has to study the Charter of
the UN. It is this Charter which will serve as the authentic source of
reference for understanding the UN. The student will not form his/her
opinion about the UN by seeing the practices of the 193 member states
of the UN. The value of the UN can be judged by its ideology rather
than the practices of its member countries.
To understand Islam, one needs to study the Quran and
Sunnah, rather than the actual behaviour of the
people who claim to be its followers.
So, too, is the case with Islam. To understand what Islam really is, you
need to study the authentic texts which contain its principles. These
are the Quran and Sunnah (practice of the Prophet of Islam). There are
more than one billion people in the world who claim to be Muslims. To
understand Islam, one needs to study the Quran and Sunnah, rather
than the actual behaviour of these people who claim to be its followers.
The right method of studying Islam is to differentiate between Islam,
on one hand, and Muslims, on the other. Muslims have to be judged in
the light of Islamic teachings, and not vice versa.
The central Islamic teaching is the discovery of God and the
understanding of God's creation plan for mankind. Prophets were
sent by God with the mission to make man aware of this creation plan.
The Quran clearly tells us that the mission of the Prophet is peaceful
dissemination of the divine message.
[O Prophet] remind them: your task is only to remind,
you are not a master over them.
THE QURAN 88: 21
Following in the footsteps of the Prophet, the primary duty of
believers is to continue this work of peacefully conveying the divine message to mankind. It should be clearly understood that there
is no Quranic verse that directs Muslims to establish ‘Islamic rule’.
This kind of commandment is alien to the Quranic scheme of
things. Political rule is a relative part of Islam, whereas the peaceful
dissemination of the divine message is an essential part of Islam. A
relevant social teaching of Islam is reflected in this Quranic verse:
As-sulh khair (THE QURAN 4: 128). That is, “Reconciliation is the best.”
According to this verse, Muslims must try to establish peaceful relations
with others. They are not commanded to impose any system on others.
If they try to impose any system, it would lead to conflict, and everything
would be jeopardized.
As far as the socio-political system is concerned, there is no ideal model
for it in Islam. It depends on the actual situation prevailing in any given
period. The socio-political system emerges from within a given society,
rather than being imposed from outside. Muslims must reconcile with
such a system. They must accept the principle of status quo in this
matter. They have been instructed not to precipitate problems. It is
in the best interests of Muslims to establish peace between people,
because peace leads to normalcy, and normalcy helps in availing
opportunities for the real mission of Islam, which is the mission of
inviting people onto God’s path.
The central Islamic teaching is the discovery of God and
the understanding of God's creation plan for mankind.
Islam does not permit Muslims to engage in war against anyone. Under
normal circumstances, Muslims are exhorted to engage in peaceful
communication of God’s message and to abstain from a confrontational
approach in all matters. The only exception to this is in the face of
aggression by others. The Quran clearly mentions that there should be
no war unless one is faced with aggression from another party. This
means that in Islam there is only one legitimate form of war, and that is
defensive war. Muslims have not been commanded to initiate war. Nor
are they allowed to engage in wars of aggression. However, if another
party begins war, then Muslims can engage in self-defence.
The Quran says:
And fight in God’s cause against those who wage war against
you, but do not commit aggression—for surely,
God does not love aggressors.
THE QURAN 2: 190
This verse clearly states that Islam allows only defensive war. Aggressive
war is not permitted in Islam. No exception whatsoever is permissible
in this regard. The Quran does contain some verses that refer to war.
These pertain to those situations when Muslims were at war. One such
verse is:
Fight those from among the People of the Book who believe
neither in God, nor in the Last Day, nor hold as unlawful what
God and His Messenger have declared to be unlawful, nor
follow the true religion, until they pay the tax
willingly and agree to submit.
THE QURAN 9: 29
In Islam there is only one legitimate form of war,
and that is defensive war.
It is important to note that this verse does not say that Muslims should
wage war with “so and so”. It only means that Muslims should fight in
defence, against those who have waged war against them. This verse
speaks of war against attackers: it is the only real reason to engage
in war against them. Their being non-believers is not the reason to
engage in war against them. The mention of non-believers here is not
to indicate that their being non-believers is the reason for war. Rather,
it is only to specify who they were. The reason for war was not that
they were non-believers, but, rather, that they were attackers. This
verse should, therefore, be understood in the light of the verse quoted
earlier. i.e. THE QURAN 2: 190.
Another point to bear in mind is that the prophetic period of the
Prophet of Islam lasted for twenty-three years. More than half this
period was spent in Makkah. There were non-believers in Makkah
then, but no verse was revealed to the Prophet commanding him to
wage war against them. Had the justification to wage war with people
been their being non-believers, the command for war would have been
given earlier, when the Prophet was in Makkah itself. But a verse of
this kind was revealed only after the Prophet’s migration to Medina.
This was because at that time, the opponents of Islam realized that
Islam was flourishing on account of having found a strong base in
Medina. It was then that they took to violent aggression. In the Makkan
period, Muslims were merely considered a different religious sect by
their opponents, but in the Medinan period they were taken as a grave
threat. That is why in the Makkan period, the opponents of Islam were only engaged in opposition, but when the Prophet migrated to Medina,
these opponents launched armed military aggression against them. It
was at this point in time that the following verse was revealed:
Permission to fight is given to those who are attacked,
because they have been oppressed.
THE QURAN 22: 39
In this verse, the word “oppression” (zulm) is meant in the sense of
aggression. As is known, during the thirteen-year period of the Prophet’s
life as a prophet in Makkah, the opponents of Islam continuously
subjected the Muslims to persecution. However, in this period, no
commandment for war was revealed. Such a command was revealed
only after the Prophet migrated to Medina, when the opponents of
Islam embarked on military aggression against the Muslims. Therefore,
in this verse “oppression” implies aggression, and not non-aggressive
oppression.
The Quran clearly mentions that there should be no war
unless one is faced with aggression from another party.
A related issue that needs clarification is that of jizyah or tribute. It must
be noted that jizyah is not a permanent command of Islam. Instead, it
was a temporary order. At that time it was common practice among
governments to impose a levy like the jizyah as a temporary punitive
tax on those who had waged an unprovoked war. This same practice
was applied to the contemporary opponents of the Prophet. Jizyah
was therefore a temporary tax imposed on those opponents of the
Prophet who were his contemporaries. The Muslim rulers who tried to
continue this practice of jizyah after the Prophet were not right. They
have misinterpreted this verse of the Quran. (THE QURAN 9: 29). Jizyah is
not at all applicable in the present age.
Yet another issue that needs clarification in this discussion about war
and peace in Islam is a Hadith from al-Bukhari, which is translated as:
“I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘La ilaha illallah’
(‘There is no god but God’), and whoever said ‘No god other than Allah’
will save his property and his life from me.”
In this Hadith, 'al-nas', or ‘people’ refers to the people of Makkah. So,
this Hadith must be interpreted only in the light of the actual conduct of
the Prophet of Islam towards the people of Makkah. It is on record that at the time when the Prophet victoriously entered Makkah in 630 CE,
most of the Makkans were non-believers. They were brought before
the Prophet while he was in the premises of the Kabah. The Prophet
did not offer them these two choices: ‘Convert to Islam or you shall be
put to death.’ On the contrary, he said to these Makkans: “Iz-habu faantum
al-tulaqa” (Ibn Hisham). That is: ‘Go, you all are free.’ Although these
people embraced the faith of Islam later on, their acceptance of Islam
was completely by choice. It was not a matter of forced conversion. In
the above Hadith, the words, “Till they say: ‘La ilaha illallah’” symbolically
implies surrender, or the ending of war.
Following in the footsteps of the Prophet, the primary
duty of the believers is to continue the work of
peacefully conveying the divine message to mankind.
After the death of the Prophet, there were some wars between the
Companions of the Prophet and the two adjacent empires—the
Byzantine Empire and the Sassanid Empire. But, these wars were started
as defensive wars by the Companions, because both these empires
had exhibited clear aggression by killing the ambassador of the Muslim
state and sending their armies at the borders of the territory of Arabia.
This led to initiation of war by the two empires.
20th century Muslim leaders wanted to revive the Muslim ummah.
However, their starting-point was wrong. They sought the revival of
Muslim history of the later period, when Muslims had established
empires. The right beginning for these leaders would have been to
seek to revive the original method of the Prophet of Islam, which was
communication of the message of God to mankind. But Muslim leaders
did not begin their endeavours from this juncture. This was clearly an
erroneous judgement on their part, and it led to widespread problems.
It exhorted some Muslims to take to violence as a means to pursue
their goals, resulting in the enormous tragedies that are unfolding all
around us now.
WORKING TOGETHER
Agree To Disagree
IN the days of the steam engine, the engine drivers had no option
but to stand at close quarters to a blazing fire. It was all part of
being an engine driver, and without that no train could have run.
Much the same thing happens to individuals who make things work in
civic life. They are confronted by the blazing fire of their own anger at
other members of society.
They rage at wrongdoers, cheats and shirkers, both real and imagined.
But just as the engine driver controls both the fire which drives the
engine and his own desire to escape from it, so must the individual in
society tame both his own fury and a desire to simply run away from
adverse situations.
If a society is to hold together and function in harmony, individuals
must learn to bear with those who oppose and hurt them. There is no
group of people in which differences of opinion do not arise; no group
in which there are never any feelings of grievance and resentment.
It would, indeed, be unrealistic to expect that everything should be
plain sailing.
If a society is to hold together and function in harmony,
individuals must learn to bear with those who
oppose and hurt them.
How then, can people live and work together? How, with seemingly
irreconcilable differences between individuals, can society be welded
into a cohesive whole? There is only one way: people must bury their
differences and agree to disagree. But this is only possible if people
react coolly and rationally in difficult situations where relations are
strained and there seems no way out of the dilemma. It can happen
only if people are fully aware of their responsibilities towards others,
as individuals, and towards their community as a whole.
This may seem to be asking for the impossible. But it is not so. Every
individual does these things in the most natural way within his own
domestic circle. In quite normal families, differences of opinion occur
almost every day, but the bonds of love and kinship prevail and grievances are all finally buried. It is in this way that a family holds
together. Every home is a practical example of people agreeing
to disagree.
There is only one way of living and working together:
people must bury their differences and agree to disagree.
This spirit of give and take which is a matter of instinct in a family is
something which can emerge in a community only through conscious
effort on the part of its members. While it is an emotional bond
that keeps families from disintegrating, it is a rational effort which
cements society, constraining its members to hold together despite all
differences.
Human Weakness.
People judge matters on
how they affect their own selves.
They are quick to support anything,
which improves their own position.
When something appears threatening
to their own position, they oppose it,
regardless of its intrinsic worth.
Dedication is Key
A dedicated person can do what an entire army may fail to do.
What is required is only the spirit of saying: ‘I will do it’.
TRADITIONAL VERSUS CREATIVE MINDSETS
Closed- and Open-Mindedness
HUMAN minds fall into two categories: Traditional or taqlidi
(imitative of past precedent) and Creative or ijtihadi (creative
reinterpretation). The former denotes a closed mind; the latter:
its opposite, an open mind. The traditional mind attains a certain level
and then stagnates, while the creative mind keeps travelling ahead,
stopping only at death.
The traditional mind attains a certain level and then
stagnates, while the creative mind keeps travelling
ahead, stopping only at death.
The difference between traditional and creative mind-sets can be
illustrated with the help of an example. Shakespeare was a famous
English writer, and so was George Bernard Shaw, who was born some
two hundred and fifty years after the former's death. Shaw's contribution
to English literature was less than that of Shakespeare, and he himself
admitted this when he said, 'I am smaller in stature than Shakespeare,
but I stand upon his shoulders'. This is an example of a creative way
of thinking, and a society characterised by such people constantly
progresses in terms of creative thinking. Each new generation in such
a society builds on the contributions of its predecessors, adds to them
and then transmits its legacy to the generations that come after it.
But contemporary Muslim societies present a completely different
picture. In modern times, their intellectual development has almost
come to a standstill. This is because they have developed a traditional,
as opposed to a creative way of thinking, and consider ijtihad—creative
reinterpretation of religious concepts or the exercise of judgement
with reasoning on such issues—to be almost a sin. Many Muslims
mistakenly believe that in terms of scholarly study, the ulema of the
past have already accomplished all that was possible to do, and that
today our task is simply to study their books and strictly follow them.
This approach is a major hurdle in the path of our intellectual progress.
In this regard, Muslims can adopt one of two positions: to recognise,
as Shaw did with regard to Shakespeare, that their stature might be less than that of the ulema of the past, but that, despite this, they are
standing on the latter's shoulders; or to believe that because their
stature is less than that of the ulema of the past, they must remain
forever at the latter's feet.
The first of these two approaches represents a creative way of thinking,
one conducive to constant intellectual development. In a society
characterised by such an approach, each new generation fully respects
those that went before it and, building, on the contributions of its predecessors,
makes even more progress.
In a creative society, each new generation builds on the
contributions of its predecessors, adds to them and then
transmits its legacy to the generations that come after it.
In contrast, the second approach represents a traditional way of
thinking, which stagnates Muslim thought, preventing it from moving
in the direction of the constantly progressive stages of the higher level
of thinking that Islam stands for. It also causes Muslims to fall behind
other communities in the intellectual field, killing their intellectual
faculties. This matter can be further elaborated with the help of some
Hadith of the Prophet.
Respect for Humanity
Several narrators of Hadith have recorded that once, in Medina, when
a procession carrying a dead body for burial passed by the Prophet, he
stood up in deference on seeing it. When his companions who were
with him pointed out to him that the deceased was a Jew, the Prophet
simply remarked: “Was he not a human being?”
This incident is included in the Hadith collection of Imam Bukhari, who
made an immense contribution to Hadith studies by collecting over 7000
reports that he considered authentic from several hundred thousand
reports that had been attributed to the Prophet. He mentioned this
Hadith in the chapter on burial in his Sahih Bukhari. Now, if we were to
adopt a traditional approach and consider this Hadith as simply relating
to burial, and nothing more, we will not be able to learn anything new
from it and would simply go on parroting what the earlier commentators
on Hadith have said about it. While we must respect the intellectual
contributions of the earlier exegetes of Hadith, we cannot accept all that they have written as gospel truth. Many ulema of the past have
commented on this Hadith, offering various theories for the Prophet's
action, with some claiming that this practice [of standing up when the
funeral procession of a non-Muslim passed by] was later abrogated,
or that the Prophet did so because he did not want the body of a Jew
to be at a level higher than that of his head, and so on. Now, all these
explanations are based on personal speculation and lack adequate
proof. This Hadith very clearly indicates that the Prophet stood up
out of respect for the dead man [and not for any of the reasons that
these Hadith commentators had suggested]. In other words, this
Hadith is not simply about burial, as those with a traditional mindset
would imagine. Rather, it is a fine example of having respect for
humankind, irrespective of religion, as those with a creative mind-set
would be able to perceive. It could be offered as a counter to those who
claim that while Islam preaches respect for fellow Muslims, it does not
do so with regard to people of other faiths. This Hadith, if approached
in a creative manner, can be presented as evidence of the Islamic
principle that all human beings are worthy of respect, no matter their
religion or community.
The Hadith in which the Prophet stood up when the
funeral procession of a non-Muslim passed by, is a
fine example of respect for humankind.
On the other hand, if this Hadith were approached in a traditional
fashion and were interpreted in the same way as those traditionalist
commentators referred to, this Islamic principle would be completely
lost to posterity.
Practical Wisdom
According to a tradition also contained in the Sahih Bukhari, the Prophet
told his wife, Aisha, that when the Quraysh rebuilt the Kabah they
did not do so on its original foundation as laid down by the Prophet
Abraham, but had chosen to erect it on a different site. Hearing this,
Aisha asked the Prophet why he could not restructure the Kabah on its
original foundation. To this the Prophet replied that the Quraysh were
newcomers to the fold of Islam and it was possible that if he were to
do so, it might cause them to agitate. He added that, had there been
no danger of that happening, he would certainly have done what Aisha
had suggested.
Imam Bukhari has included this Hadith in his chapter on Hajj. Now,
if we were to consider the Hadith simply in this manner, reflecting a
traditional approach, all that we would gain from it would be some
information about the glories of Makkah. If, on the other hand, we
adopted a creative approach to this Hadith, we would be able to have
a new understanding of what may be called the wisdom of practical
living. To leave the Kabah on the foundations laid down by the Quraysh,
instead of reconstructing it on the foundation laid by the Prophet
Abraham, might appear to have been incorrect. But, despite this, the
Prophet chose not to reconstruct it in the latter way because, in the
given circumstances, this would have posed additional problems.
Some Muslim leaders have sought to impose Shariah laws
on society without first seeking to prepare society to
willingly accept them, in total contrast to what
the Hadith suggests is the right way.
From this practice of the Prophet we can derive the principle that, in
life when sometimes faced with certain challenges, for the moment we
should look not at what is right and what is wrong, but, instead, at what
is possible and what is not.
Abiding by this principle is a key to succeeding in this world. In today's
world, many of the failures of Muslims have been because they have
not abided by this principle. They have not looked at problems or
challenges from the point of view of what is possible and what is not,
but have rather considered them only from the perspective of what
is right and what is not. Accordingly, they have rushed into action,
hoping to attain what they thought was ideal, although, in the given
circumstances, achieving it was not actually possible. Many of the
sacrifices that Muslims in modern times have made, but that have not
borne any fruits, have been the result of disregarding the principle that
this Hadith refers to. The major cause of this attitude is the traditional
mind-set of the people
Gradualism in the Revelation of Islamic Commandments
According to another Hadith in the Sahih Bukhari, Aisha once
mentioned that many of the earliest chapters of the Quran dealt with
the subject of heaven and hell and that only after people's faith in
Islam had become strong, were the verses dealing with issues that are permissible (halal) and forbidden (haram) sent down. She added that
had the commandments forbidding the consumption of alcohol and
adultery been revealed in the beginning, instead of at a later stage,
people would have refused to obey them.
Imam Bukhari has included this Hadith in his chapter on the compilation
of the Quran. Now if, from a traditional perspective, we were to view
this Hadith simply from the point of view of its being related to the
compilation of the Quran, we would not be able to derive any other
knowledge from it. On the other hand, by engaging in creativity and
reflecting on the wider implications of this Hadith, going beyond its
relevance to the question of the compilation of the Quran, we can
discover that this Hadith suggests a very important Islamic principle—
that with regard to the enforcement of the rules of the Shariah, a
certain wisdom is required: it must be a gradual process, as it was in
early Islamic times. In the beginning, peoples' faith was made firm so
that they would be receptive to obeying Divine commands, and only
then were various laws introduced.
If in a certain place conditions are inappropriate, one
should shift to another place. If conflict is likely to prove
useless, one should seek to achieve one's objectives
through peaceful dialogue.
If the approach of present-day Islamic leaders is examined in the light
of this particular Hadith, it appears that they have failed to appreciate
its underlying, broader implications with regards to the process of
establishing Islamic laws in society. In many Muslim countries today,
a number of movements and groups are actively engaged in the
enforcement of the Shariah, but despite their many sacrifices this has
not happened anywhere, in the true sense of the term. This is because
the faith of Muslims has weakened, and their intellectual and emotional
commitment has declined, and this means that many of them are no
longer willing to accept Shariah laws. Despite their fervent attempts to
enforce Shariah laws, these Muslim leaders are lacking in the necessary
creative approach and insight. They have rushed into the political realm
armed with their traditional baggage, and have thus failed to achieve
their objectives. They have sought to impose Shariah laws on a society
without first seeking to prepare that very society to willingly accept
them, in total contrast to what the Hadith suggests is the right way.
Change in Field of Activity
According to another Hadith contained in the Sahih Bukhari, the Prophet
is said to have remarked that he had been instructed to proceed to
another town, Medina, which people then referred to as Yathrib.
Imam Bukhari has included this Hadith in his chapter on the glories of
Medina. Now, those with a traditional approach will view this Hadith
as providing information about the glories of Medina, and indeed this
is what most exegetes of Hadith in the past have done. Some have
even seen this Hadith as indicating that to refer to Medina as Yathrib is
disapproved off (makruh). However, the Quran itself refers to Medina
as Yathrib, and so this explanation of the Hadith is incorrect. But, if
one goes beyond the blind imitation of the past exegetes and ponders
on this Hadith from a creative perspective, one learns that it speaks
about a very important Islamic principle—that of changing one's field
or arena of action. This Hadith indicates that when conditions became
extremely severe and harsh for Muslims in Makkah, God commanded
the Prophet to shift from there to another town, Yathrib, where he and
his followers would find a more propitious atmosphere, so much so
that it would become a centre of Islam and people would start referring
to it as the 'City of the Prophet' or Madinat al-Rasul or the 'City of Islam'
or Madinat al-Islam.
The present generation needs an encyclopaedia of
genuine Hadith traditions written in a creative style that
would enable a proper understanding of them.
This principle of shifting one's arena of activity—if conditions so
demand—which this Hadith refers to, is important for success in
various matters. It indicates that if in a certain place conditions are
inappropriate, one should shift to another place, or that if conflict is
likely to prove useless, one should seek to achieve one's objectives
through peaceful dialogue. Unfortunately, today's Muslim leaders,
burdened by their traditional mentality, have not been able to
appreciate and act on this wisdom, because of which they have
themselves suffered considerable damage and loss. For instance, in
several countries today, violent movements involving conflict in the
name of Islam have resulted in Muslims having to suffer massive loss
of life and property. Because of their traditional approach, the leaders
of these movements have been unable to appreciate the underlying
message of this Hadith of the Prophet. They would have been able to understand the import of this Hadith if they had a creative approach.
In that case, and in accordance with the principle enunciated by this
Hadith, they would have abandoned the path of conflict and adopted
peaceful means instead. Following that, in accordance with the law of
nature, they would have succeeded.
From these above-mentioned examples it has been sought to clarify
the distinction between the taqlidi (traditional) and ijtihadi (creative)
approaches. The former stops at the initial stage and refuses to move
ahead. In contrast, the latter proceeds through many stages, seeking a
logical conclusion. The first step is the end in itself for those who abide
by tradition, but for those inspired by and committed to creativity, it is
a means, a path to the higher stages.
Stages of Studying the Hadith
The early scholars of Hadith made an immense contribution by collecting
and compiling a vast number of traditions. This could be described
as the first stage in the study of Hadith. In what could be called the
second stage, the next generation of Hadith scholars prepared indices
of Hadith in order to make the subject easier to understand. In the third
stage of the development of the study of Hadith, the Companions of
the Prophet and the two generations that succeeded them edited and
compiled the commentaries on Hadith, thus preparing the necessary
background material for a proper understanding of Hadith.
The fourth stage in the study of Hadith entails studying them in their
particular temporal context in order to appreciate their broader
meaning and implications. A sincere attempt at this has been made with
regard to selected Hadith traditions dealt with above. The fifth stage in
the study of Hadith could be to prepare an extensive encyclopaedia
of all genuine Hadith traditions so as to enable people to properly
understand them in a style with which they are familiar. These stages
suggested in the study of Hadith are not categorical or final. Rather,
these are offered simply for the purpose of indicating the differences
between a traditional and a creative way of understanding, and to point
out the benefits of the latter.
TWO TYPES OF PSYCHE
Differentiate Between Them
EVERY person acts according to his psychological make-up. This
is true for Muslims, too. All of a person's actions will reflect the
psyche that has been developed in his personality. This psyche
can be of two types. These two types can be explained briefly as:
‘Islam is true’ and ‘I am true’.
There appears to be a difference of just one word in these two phrases.
The first phrase contains the word ‘Islam’, while the second contains
the word ‘I’. But in this seemingly minor difference is hidden the entire
story of the rise and fall of Muslims. When Muslims are on the right
path, they perceive and know Islam to be true. But when they fall victim
to degeneration, they think it is they themselves who are true. The first
conception engenders the fear of God. The second promotes a false
sense of superiority.
When Muslims are on the right path, they perceive and
know Islam to be true. But when they fall victim to
degeneration, they think it is they themselves
who are true.
Islam is, without any doubt, the true religion. When someone realizes
the truth of Islam, an enormous transformation takes places within
him. He becomes the epitome of virtues. He develops a passionate
commitment to communicate the message of Islam to everyone else.
Archimedes discovered only a law about water, and when that happened
he was so overwhelmed that he rushed out naked from the bath, crying
out ‘Eureka! Eureka!’ (which in Greek, means ‘I have found [it]!’).
That being the case, if one were to discover the greatest truth about
the universe, one can imagine what his condition would be!
The Islam that one discovers on the basis of God-realization is obtained
directly from God. That is why a person whose Islam is of this sort
is suffused with the attributes that emerge within someone who has
seen and experienced God. He trembles on witnessing God’s glory.
His awareness of God’s perfection divests him of his tendency to defy
God’s will. In contrast, someone who receives Islam as an inheritance
considers it as a matter of communal pride or ancestral prestige. As a
result he develops a false sense of pride.
One who receives Islam, as an inheritance considers it as
a matter of communal pride or ancestral prestige. As a
result he develops a false sense of pride.
If sea-water evaporates, what is left is just salt. The case of Muslims is
somewhat similar. If they lose the fear of God in their religion, what
remains of it is only salt, which only makes the religion unpalatable
to others.
Focused Thinking
If you take everything seriously without differentiation,
then your focus will be scattered.
Your time and energy will be wasted,
and you will not be able to
do anything valuable.
Scientific Temperament
The scientist believes that reality is what
manifests itself outwardly and not
what exists in his own mind.
The scientific temperament negates
self-importance in a man and
makes him a realist.
FROM THE SPIRITUAL TREE
There is a tree beside my house. I call
it the 'Spiritual Tree'. I derive spiritual
inspiration from it. A tree is an evergrowing
being that was initially a seed
possessing the potential of becoming a
full-grown tree. A seed takes food from the
universe around it and then grows into a
tree. The same is true with spirituality,
the desire for which is intrinsic to, and an
integral part of, the very nature of, every
human being. To realize this spirituality,
Man must derive spiritual food from the
universe around him. A tree converts
carbon-dioxide into oxygen; a spiritual person is one who can take positive lessons
from negative situations. From this perspective, a tree is an embodiment of a
spiritual personality.
—Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
CALL OF THE JUDGEMENT DAY
THE duas (supplications) that the Prophet has taught us are not
some mysterious magical formulae which one utters to seek
favours from God. These duas in reality are an expression of
true submission to God. They are a result of deep contemplation and
God-realization. They are a portrayal of the feelings of those who seek
to live a God-oriented life; who derive spiritual lessons from all events
and for whom the Hereafter is the ultimate goal.
Every evening is an illustration of the scenario after
the first call of the Day of Judgement.
According to the Quran and Hadith, when the first clarion call of the
Day of Judgement is sounded, all of mankind will fall unconscious.
Following this, the second call will be a wake-up call when all mankind
will gather in an assembly before the presence of God.
For a true believer, every evening is a likeness of the first call of the Day
of Judgement. Every evening we witness the weary returning to their
dwellings. The birds and the beasts also return to their homes. The sun returns to the West from its eastern position. All creatures big and small
return to their destinations. This same scenario on a much larger scale
will be reenacted after the first call of the Day of Judgement. Everything
will leave its temporary abode and return to its permanent abode.
Every night, a God-conscious person envisages this scenario of the Day
of Judgement. Retiring to bed will appear symbolically as sleeping in
one’s grave. The silence of every home at night will appear like the
silence of the graveyard. Now, we can understand the following dua of
the Prophet:
Oh Lord! We have come to the evening in Your refuge, and we
see the morning in Your refuge, and we live with Your Name
and we die with Your Name, and we will return unto You.
After the night when the new morning dawns it has the likeness of
the second call of the Day of Judgement. Every morning people awake
from their slumber and start with their worldly pursuits. Some run
towards their businesses; some are hurrying for their family. Others
are scurrying after wealth and some running after political power. On
the Day of Judgement when mankind is raised from their graves, there
will be a similar scenario. Only, all will be running towards the assembly
before God.
Every morning is an illustration of the scenario of
the second call of the Day of Judgement.
When a believer wakes up in the morning and stands before God in
prayer, he feels like he is standing before God with the record of his
deeds. He glorifies God, praising Him and asking for His forgiveness.
Now, we can understand the following dua of the Prophet:
All praise is for God, who gave us life after having
taken it from us, unto Him is the resurrection.
In this world, the system of day and night created by God is a lesson
for us to understand the Hereafter. Here, every day we witness life and
death. In the Hereafter we will live forever. Every evening therefore is
an illustration of the scenario after the first call of the Day of Judgement.
Every morning is an illustration of the scenario of the second call of the
Day of Judgement.
ASHES BEAR WITNESS
Deeds are Forever
NABI Karim is a locality in Delhi. Ashok, a young man who worked
as a labourer, lived there many years ago. One day, he was
found dead near his house. According to the doctor’s report,
he had died of a sudden heart failure. This incident was not reported
to the police. The next day, Ashok’s body was taken to the banks of the
Yamuna, where it was consigned to the flames. His ashes were then
scattered in the river.
It seemed that matters had ended with this, and that if Ashok’s
death had been the result of a criminal conspiracy, there was now
no possibility of finding out the truth. But Ashok’s ashes made an
astounding announcement, which no conventional sources were
able to.
Ashok’s mother, Chameli Devi, suspected that her son had not died a
natural death, but that a friend of his, Suresh, had killed him by giving
him liquor laced with poison. And so, she lodged a case with the police.
God has made this world in such a way that as soon as a
deed is done, it gets affixed to the ‘cosmic record’ and
no one can ever rub it off thereafter.
The only way that the police could investigate the case was to get hold
of Ashok’s ashes and examine them. The day Chameli Devi lodged her
case with the police, a party of policemen arrived at the crematorium
where Ashok’s body had been cremated. As luck would have it, no other
corpse had been burned on the same platform after Ashok’s body, and
so the police were able to gather some of his ashes. They sent these to
the Central Forensic Science Laboratory for investigation. Six months
later, the laboratory issued a report, certifying that Ashok had not
died a natural death; but, rather, had been poisoned. Soon after this,
Suresh, whom Chameli Devi had suspected of murdering her son, was
arrested. In a report about this case, a daily newspaper commented:
Dead men tell no tales, but their ashes may.
People commit crimes and seek to hide the records of their deeds,
thinking that they can wipe away the evidence of their actions. They do wrong, and, imagining that they are very clever and powerful, try
to conceal their actions, believing that no one will ever come to know
about them. But they forget that they do not live in a world of their own
making, and that this world has been made by God. God has made this
world in such a way that as soon as a deed is done, it gets affixed to the
‘cosmic record’ and no one can ever rub it off thereafter.
Every person is free to do what he wants, but he is certainly not free to
rub off the marks of his deeds. If Man were truly aware of this inability
of his, he would abstain from oppression and wrongful deeds.
THE WORD OF GOD
From The Scriptures
THE Quran is the book of God. It has been preserved in its
entirety since its revelation to the Prophet of Islam between
610 and 632 A.D. It is a book that brings glad tidings to mankind,
along with divine admonition, and stresses the importance of man’s
discovery of the Truth on a spiritual and intellectual level.
Translated from Arabic and commentary
by Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
Say, ‘Tell me if the punishment of God came upon you or the Hour
overtook you, would you call upon any other than God, if you are
truthful?’ Indeed, it is on Him that you would call, and He could remove
that [affliction] which made you call on Him, if He will, and then you
would forget [the false deities] which you associate with Him!’
History bears witness to the fact that a man starts invoking the name
of God in crucial moments; even one who relied on beings other
than God, or did not believe in God’s existence at all. This is nature’s
testament to God’s existence and His being the absolute authority.
Under extraordinary circumstances, when the outward veils are
removed and when man dismisses all superficial thoughts, he does
not remember anything except God. In other words, on reaching the
point of helplessness, every man admits the existence of God. But
the Quran demands that man should follow a course of acceptance
and obedience at a time when there is no apparent compulsion to
do so.
All animals other than man instinctively lead realistic lives. But
what pushes man towards realism and admission of the truth is the
psychology of fear. In the world of animals all things are accomplished
by instinct. The same role is played by fear of God (taqwa) in the world
of human beings.
We sent messengers before you [Prophet] to many communities and
afflicted their people with suffering and hardship, so that they might
humble themselves. When the affliction decreed by Us befell them,
they did not humble themselves, but rather their hearts hardened, for Satan had made all their doings seem fair to them. When they had
forgotten Our admonition, We granted them all that they desired; but
just as they were rejoicing in what they were given, We seized them
suddenly and they were plunged into despair. The wrongdoers were
thus annihilated. All praise be to God, the Lord of the Worlds.
When a man is faced with the truth and he does not accept it, God
does not seize him immediately, but gives him some jolts by way of
monetary loss or physical trouble, so that he should review his way
of life, and his thinking should be revolutionised. Life’s events are not
mere happenings but vibrant messages from God sent to wake a man
up from his sleep of forgetfulness. But man learns nothing from these
things. He consoles himself by saying that these are normal ups and
downs and that such ups and downs do occur in life. In this way, Satan
all too often diverts the mind of the individual from possible divine
disfavour and pushes him into the negligence of his religious duties by
providing him with plausible justifications. When a man indulges in this
type of behaviour again and again, his heart loses all sensitivity to what
is true or false; right or wrong. His conscience eventually becomes
totally blunted.
When a man ignores the warnings received from God, His approach
towards him changes. Now, God’s decision for him is for the doors to
comfort and success should be opened for him; he should be granted
prosperity in full measure; his honour and popularity should increase.
This is in reality, a punishment, so that the evil hidden in him should
come out clearly. The purpose of this is that man should feel satisfied
with himself and become more and more insensitive and much bolder
in ignoring the Truth. And, as a result, his meriting punishment is fully
established. When this purpose is achieved, God’s retribution suddenly
overwhelms him. He is deprived of worldly life and presented before
the court of the Hereafter, so that he may be awarded the punishment
of Hell.
This world is God’s world. Here the right to have one’s greatness
extolled belongs to only one Being. So, if a man ignores the divine
truth, he is in fact disrespecting God. In a world over-arched by the
majesty of the Almighty, he wants to establish his own greatness. In
this way he is indulging in unparalleled transgression. He is being
insolent to God before whom no behaviour other than that of the
utmost humility is proper.
ASK MAULANA
Your Questions Answered
Does the Quran teach Muslims to kill others?
There are certain verses in the Quran, which
convey injunctions similar to the following: ‘Kill
them wherever you find them.’ (
Referring to such verses, there are some who
attempt to give the impression that Islam is
a religion of war and violence. This is totally
untrue. Such verses relate in a restricted sense,
to those who have unilaterally attacked the
Muslims. The above verse does not convey the
general command of Islam.
The truth of the matter is that the Quran was not revealed in the
complete form in which it exists today. It was revealed from time to
time, according to the circumstances, over a time span of 23 years. If
this is divided into years of war and peace, the period of peace amounts
to 20 years, while that of war amounts only to 3 years. The revelations
during the 20 peaceful years were the peaceful teachings of Islam as
are conveyed in the verses regarding the realization of God, worship,
morality, justice, etc.
This division of commands into different categories is a natural one
and is found in all religious books. For instance, the Gita, the holy book
of the Hindus, pertains to wisdom and moral values. Yet along with this
is the exhortation of Krishna to Arjun, encouraging him to fight (
This does not mean that believers in the Gita should wage wars all the
time. Gandhiji, after all, derived his philosophy of non-violence from
the same Gita. The exhortation to wage war in the Gita applies only to
exceptional cases where the circumstances leave no other choice. But
for general day-to-day existence it gives the same peaceful commands
as derived from it by Mahatma Gandhi.
Similarly, Jesus Christ said:
Do not think that I came to bring peace on Earth.
I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
Matthew, Chapter 10
It would not be right to conclude that the religion preached by Christ was one of war and violence, for such utterances relate purely to
particular occasions. So far as general life is concerned, Christ taught
peaceful values, such as the building up of a good character, loving
each other, helping the poor and needy, etc.
The same is true of the Quran. When the Prophet of Islam emigrated
from Makkah to Medina, the unbelieving tribes were aggressive
towards him. But the Prophet always averted their attacks by the
exercise of patience and the strategy of avoidance. However on certain
occasions no other options existed, save that of retaliation. Therefore,
he had do battle on certain occasions. It was these circumstances,
which occasioned those revelations relating to war. These commands,
being specific to certain circumstances, had no general application.
They were not meant to be valid for all time to come. That is why the
permanent status of the Prophet has been termed a ‘mercy for all
mankind.’ (
Does Islam Permit Terrorism and Suicide Bombings?
According to the teachings of Islam, Muslims are not permitted to
commit suicidal bombings in order to destroy the enemy. Strapping
explosives on to oneself and hurling oneself upon the civilian
settlements of even those with whom one is at war, for the purpose of
destroying the enemy, and in the process killing oneself deliberately, is
totally un-Islamic. This can in no way be termed ‘Shahadah’ (martyrdom).
According to Islam we can become martyrs, but we cannot court a
martyr’s death deliberately.
Terrorism based on religion is perhaps the most dangerous
phenomenon of Muslim history. Throughout Islamic history, that is,
until very recently, action has always meant result-oriented action. But
in modern times, for the first time, the Muslim mentality has become
so distorted that, on occasion, fruitless action has also come to be
considered desirable. Suicide bombing, which shows a preference for
death over life, falls into this category. While in the early history of
Islam this was an alien concept, in modern times, for Muslims, it has
acquired the position of a superior course of action.
How has the act of suicide come to rate so highly as a solution to political
problems? The reason is not traceable to some special devotional
attachment to Islam, but is due rather to an inimical attitude towards
man. As the suicide bomber ties the bombs onto his body, it is not proIslamic,
but rather anti-humanity sentiments, which motivate him to adopt such a deadly course. This is a reality that no one in his senses
can deny.
According to the Quran, a Muslim is one who is man’s well-wisher.
But the greatest weakness of the Muslims of today is that they do not
in their hearts wish well of others. They hold all nations to be their foes.
This animosity has so increased that they are ready to cross all moral
limits when it comes to attacking their supposed enemies. If they think
they can harm them by killing themselves, they are willing to take the
extreme step of suicide bombing.
The truth is that suicide is totally forbidden (haram) in Islam. Under
no circumstances and on no pretext whatsoever is committing suicide
lawful. It is forbidden to the point where, if someone is dying, and it is
certain that he will not survive, even in his final moments Islam does
not allow him to take his own life.
Solution to Poverty
Giving favour is not a solution to
the problem of poverty.
Favour makes one
an intellectually stagnant person,
while meeting challenges makes one
an intellectually awakened person.
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan (1925-2021) was an Islamic scholar, spiritual guide, and an Ambassador of Peace. He authored over 200 books and recorded thousands of lectures giving the rational interpretation of Islamic concepts, prophetic wisdom, and the spiritual meaning of the Quran in the contemporary style. His English translation, The Quran, is widely appreciated as simple, clear and in contemporary style. He founded Centre for Peace and Spirituality (CPS) International in 2001 to re-engineer minds towards God-oriented living and present Islam as it is, based on the principles of peace, spirituality, and co-existence. Maulana breathed his last on 21 April, 2021 in New Delhi, India. His legacy is being carried forward through the CPS International Network.
What God most earnestly desires from human beings is worship. The Quran says: “I have not created jinn and mankind except to worship Me.” ( 51:56 )
