this sterling quality, we have fallen short in taking the country towards progress and prosperity. What is national character? It is, to put it simply, the capacity and the will to hold the interests of

have to carve out a far more serious plan of action. After independence we should have done exactly what the British people did. For them, Winston Churchill’s position was one of a super freedom-fighter

wrongly attributed to us and thus a chapter which had already been closed was unnecessarily reopened. What we required in New Delhi was a team imbued not with fighting spirit but with wisdom, who could run

legal document, just like the constitutions of the developed countries. 2.Another point to ponder is what had been advised by Dr Rajendra Prashad in his capacity as Chairman of the Constitution Assembly,

relevant journalistic commentaries. After listening to fellow participants and duly taking stock of what the press has to say I have formed the impression that there is a nationwide acceptance of the existence

wait-and-see policy, and to avoid taking any practical step save that of peaceful negotiation. This is what will ultimately open all doors to activity in non-political arenas. Once Vinoba Bhave visited Kashmir

balance, by reconciling the dual necessities of stability and flexibility, but recent history has shown what lopsidedness can be the result. The long established idea that punishment should be inflicted, not

life. But they have not benefitted by being accorded equal status with men in life outside the home. What this new departure has done is leave insoluble problems in its wake, one of them being illegal sexual

age can be accurately calculated. But its age, reckoned by this method, falls incredibly short of what it would have to be, for the life forms at present extant to have taken their present shape through