THE UNIVERSE DECLARES
Arguments for the Existence of God
THE CHRISTIAN Mission of Kerala published a booklet titled Nature
and Science Speak about God. In this 28-page newspaper-sized
book, scientific discoveries about the universe are mentioned to
bring home the point that the existence of God is a fact that cannot be
denied in any way.
The greatest evidence of God before us is His creation. Nature itself
and our study of nature, both proclaim that there is one God who, in
the infinity of His wisdom, has created and continues to sustain the
universe.
Scorpions, fleas, and many other similar creatures of land and water
combat and control their enemies by making use of their stings. At
the tip of their sting is a very small aperture
through which they inject a type of poison
into their enemy’s body. If this aperture was
at the very end of the sting, it would be closed
when the sting was inserted into the body.
Moreover, the sting would not efficiently
pierce the skin of the target. That is the
reason the aperture is always a bit slanted
like the hole in the doctor’s syringe. This is
to cite just one example of intelligent design.
Whatever object you see in nature manifests
such design. The universe is not a random pile
of garbage, but rather it exhibits tremendous
purpose and discipline. Could this come about
without a conscious plan?
Whatever object
you see in nature
manifests intelligent
design. The universe
is not a random
pile of garbage, but
rather it exhibits
tremendous purpose
and discipline. Could
this happen without
a conscious plan?
Termites build for themselves houses that are thousand times bigger
than their size. If we try to build our homes in the same proportions,
we will need to erect a mile-high wall. Termites can live in the wood and
carve their homes inside. Studying their lives reveals many wonderful
occurrences. To take just one example: Termites eat wood. After stone,
wood is the most indigestible of all known materials, but it does not
pose a problem for termites. They have specific jaws for the purpose,
which not only serve as a saw and but also function as grinder.
However, no matter how much the wood is ground, it will still remain
wood, and will only induce indigestion rather than satisfy the need
for food in the stomach. What is it, then, that helps termites? There are many microorganisms in the intestines of the termite to facilitate
this function. These microorganisms make certain alterations to the
swallowed wood so that they can be digested and provide nourishment
to the body. Who brings about this amazing arrangement?
Consider the structure of eggs. Each egg has seven different
characteristics, all of which are so important that even if one of them
is missing, the egg would not survive as an egg. The outer-shell made
of limestone, the pores inside the shell that provide passage to the air,
the thin membrane that surrounds the insides of the egg, the yolk and
egg white forming the food of the hatching chicks inside the shell, the
germ of the baby, the ligament that keeps the germ fixed in the right
direction. Remove any one of these, and the egg will never become a
nourishing place for the chicks. Is this aggregation of seven different
things simply a coincidence?
“Coincidence” cannot explain the presence of these seven different
things, which are found to be in precise and perfect condition. What
is even more baffling is why are only these things accumulated in the
egg by “coincidence”. Why not a leaf of a plant, some form of wood,
a piece of stone, and thousands of such things that could have been
contained inside, enter the shell? If any of such
things were inside the shell, they would have
destroyed the egg. The most perplexing thing
is that when the chick is ready to get out of
the egg, a small hard horn appears on its beak
with which this ‘lump of flesh’ is able to break
through the walls of its shell. After fulfilling
its purpose, the horn falls off automatically a
few days after the chick is born. How did such
precision come about in the egg?
There are numerous
things in the universe
that would require an
entire library just to
name them, whereas
in proportion, current
human knowledge
of the cosmos is
minimal compared
to the vastness of
the universe. What
we have yet to see,
is much more than
what we have seen.
Ponder upon your own existence. How
wonderful the human body is! Look at the
brain. A telephone exchange that connects all
the men, women and children of the planet at
every moment; that continuously exchanges
messages with them. If you can conjure up
such a telephone exchange, you have only
estimated a tiny bit of the incredibly complex
system of the brain.
There are about a hundred billion nerve cells inside your brain. There
are very fine wires coming out of each nerve cell and they are spread all over the body. They are called nerve fibres and function to conduct
information in the form of electrical impulses to other cells, muscles
and glands in the body. A system of information transmission on these
thin fibres runs at a speed of about hundred kilometres per hour.
Look at the heart, a small organ about the size of the fist. It weighs
no more than 200 grams, but this little pump of the human body runs
continuously day and night. It pumps 100,000 times a day and sends
about six litres of blood to the entire body every minute. The heart has
been endowed with extraordinary capability for achieving this amazing
performance.
There are numerous things in the universe
that would require an entire library just
to list them. On the other hand, current
human knowledge of the cosmos is miniscule
compared to the vastness of the universe.
What we have yet to see, is much more than
what we have seen.
The term ‘law of
nature’ simply
expresses that things
always come into
existence under a
certain principle
and will always
come into being in
the same way. This
does not indicate
why something is
happening?
Did this brilliant workmanship, this complete
planning, and this perfect intelligence happen
by chance? Of course, sometimes an incident
does happen by chance. For example, a gust
of wind sometimes blows up a pollen of a red
rose and puts it on a white rose, resulting in
a yellow flower. But this kind of coincidence
can produce only partial and subtle changes. It can only account for
this particular colour of the rose, not for the entire existence of the
rose. Coincidence does not always explain why a particular type of
system continues to be consistent. It does not explain why there is
regularity and organization in our world. The process of “coincidence”
will not keep repeating itself. It is not possible for coincidence to bring
into existence today what transpired yesterday. Then why do all things
always appear in the same form with total uniformity? Why are natural
systems and laws so methodical, mathematical and regulated?
If some pieces of metal are tossed into the air, what are the probabilities
that they would fall to the ground in the form of moulded typeface
letter and upon falling, form some meaningful text on a page? If this
cannot happen simply by chance, then why is it assumed that such a
large world with such amazing features has come into being by chance?
What academic argument could be put forth to prove a theory that
could not be proven in a laboratory?
Another justification that materialist thinkers rely on is the term ‘the
law of nature’. “Why do chicks come out of the hen’s egg in 21 days,
whereas from the egg of the ostrich, the
babies take 45 days to hatch?” There are a
number of questions of this nature which
are answered by the materialist simply as:
“It is a law of nature.” This does appear to
be a justification, but in fact this answer only
describes one incident. By using the words
‘law of nature’, we only acknowledge the
order and function of the universe. These
words do not explain why this discipline and
performance is established in the first place.
The term ‘law of nature’ simply expresses that
things always come into existence under a certain principle and will
always come into being in the same way. This does not indicate why
something is happening? It does not state the cause of the incident, but
only presents the picture of the event.
Science has furnished
us with many
new insights. But
whatever it offers is
only a detail of a few
events. Science has
no answer for why
they are happening.
If you ask a doctor why the blood is red, he will reply that the blood
contains minute red particles called red blood cells.
“True, but why are these particles red?”
“These particles contain a special substance called haemoglobin, which
turns red when it absorbs oxygen in the lungs.”
“Okay, but where do the red blood cells carrying haemoglobin come
from?”
“They are prepared in your spleen.”
“That’s wonderful, doctor, but tell me how is it that blood, red blood
cells, spleen and thousands of other things are organized in such a
coherent way and act so unitedly that I can breathe, run, speak, and
live.”
“Ah! That is the law of nature.”
“What is it that you call law of nature?”
“When I say ‘nature’, I mean the interplay of blind physical and chemical
forces.”
“But doctor, what causes these blind forces in nature to always act in a
direction that leads them to a definite end? How do they organize their
activities in such a way that a bird can fly, a fish can swim and a human
being comes into existence with his unique abilities?”
“Don’t ask me, my friend. A doctor can only tell what is happening.
He does not have the answer for the question: Why something is
happening?”
This conversation aptly illustrates the reality of science. Indeed, science
has furnished us with many new insights. But whatever it offers
is only a detail of a few events. Science has no answer for why they
are happening. How do the delicate organs of a fly work? Of course,
science has told us a lot in this regard, but who is the one who thought
that bees needed these delicate organs, and provided them with such
fine skilfulness? To explain the order of the
universe and its appropriateness, and to show
why various kinds of blind forces act towards
a particular end—what we need is something
other than the presence of these powers. The
description of a bed is not enough if we just
throw a few words such as mattress, pillows
and bedstead. A castle is the name given to
a structure of millions of bricks and other
things installed in their proper and ordered
place. For any small organ of the human body
to come into being, it is necessary that millions of atoms come together
in a unique and special setting. Blind forces cannot always express
this kind of purpose, they cannot create meaning and harmony within
events.
The law of nature is
a phenomenon of the
universe. It is not a
justification of the
universe. It seeks
justification for its
own existence.
Science does not tell us how or why the laws of nature came into being,
how or why they continue to exist or why they cause the Earth and
the heavens to function with such unfailing precision that, simply by
observing them, it was possible to establish immutable scientific laws.
The fact is that the law of nature is a phenomenon of the universe. It
is not a justification of the universe. It seeks justification for its own
existence. As Cecil Boyce Hamann says, ‘Nature does not explain, she
is herself in need of an explanation.’
What this means is the existence of meaningfulness in something is
clear evidence that there is a mind behind it. The germ of life (sperm
cells) that is nourished in a male’s body is very similar to the other
cells in the body, but it has a unique and remarkable feature very
different from other cells. By attaching itself with a special egg cell of
a female, it has the ability to bring into existence a completely new
human being. How is it possible that two cells, each of which are raised
in two completely different bodies, are capable of acting so amazingly together? Can this event be explained without acknowledging the
involvement of a creative mind?
Acknowledging the existence of a creative mind in the universe is
not like accepting a baseless tradition. In fact, many of the inevitable
conclusions from the discoveries of science
lead us to this belief. Numerous scientific
facts compel us to accept the existence of a
driving force behind the universe. Just like the
sound from the radio compels us to recognize
the presence of radio waves, even though we
do not see them. When sugar is added to the
glass of water, it will dissolve in such a way
that it will not be visible to the eyes. But by
tasting it with your tongue, you can detect
the presence of sugar in water. Similarly, God
is not visible to the eyes, but when we study
the world of our surroundings, our instinct
and intuition cry out that there is God here,
without whom the universe could not exist.
The greatest evidence
of God before us is
His creation. Nature
itself and our study
of nature, both
proclaim that there
is one God who, in
the infinity of His
wisdom, has created
and continues to
sustain the universe.
The fact is that the stupendous increase of human knowledge has not
distanced man from God, but has brought man closer to Him. To doubt
God’s existence is merely to declare our ignorance. How definitive then
are Pasteur’s words:
A smattering of science turns people away from God.
Much of it brings them back to Him.