RELIGION AND THE LIFE HEREAFTER
Points to Ponder
The crux of religion is indubitably the belief in the life Hereafter.
SO says Allama Shibli Nomani (1857-1914) under the heading ‘Life
after Death’ in his famous book, Al Ghazzali. He goes on to say
that it is because of this belief that religion has had an impact on
human activities. Yet, despite it being the single most important belief
in religion, it has been open to question. He quotes a Bedouin poet
who, addressing his wife, expresses this most succinctly:
Death, rebirth,
My dear: it is all nonsense.
The existence of
the soul is a matter
of intuition. After
pondering over it,
we come to know
that the faculty of
reason is not merely
a property of matter.
Matter is a lifeless
thing.
Shibli feels that the first and most difficult hurdle to be surmounted is
acceptance of the fact that the spirit survives as an entity in its own right,
quite independently of the body. The materialists for their part think of
the soul as being just one more ingredient in
the body, in the way that a chemical element
is inextricably a part of a compound, or they
regard it as being a particular property of the
faculties of thought and sense perception on
a parallel with the melody which results when
notes of a musical instrument are struck in a
particular sequence. Drawing extensively on
two of Imam Ghazzali’s books, he observes
that the description of the soul and the
arguments which Ghazzali has mentioned
are all derived from Greek philosophers.
Aristotle in his Theology has said the same
and Avicenna has reiterated this in his own
language. But the strange thing is that Ghazzali has left out the point
which is of prime importance in the discussion of spirit or soul. Soul
has no body. It is an essence. It being purely non-material, makes it of
the first importance to prove its existence. As Shibli himself observes:
The existence of the soul is a matter of intuition. After pondering
over it, we come to know that the faculty of reason is not merely
a property of matter. Matter is a lifeless thing. Without reason,
you cannot find sublime ideas, arts and sciences and scientific
disciplines in matter. These are delicate substances, quite other
than matter, which account for creativity in the fields of the arts and the sciences. Matter cannot have a creative faculty. This is
an attribute of the soul After proving the existence of soul as
something separate, the second stage is to prove its survival,
that is, its capacity to survive after the death of the body.
As a corollary to this he adds: ‘Though Avicenna has presented lengthy
arguments about the existence of the soul, these are nothing but word
games—or tautology—just like other Greek philosophic thoughts. If an
atheist bent on denying its existence says, “What you have said is just a
kind of repetition of your claim. It has nothing to do with the argument
but is a reiteration of your initial statement and may be matter itself
is responsible for its kaleidoscopic manifestations after combining in
a particular way; the working of a machine and the music of a musical
instrument are similar things, but without having any kind of spirit."
There is no logic by which he can be reduced to silence. That is why
Imam Ghazzali did not produce any logical argument about the soul.’
Shibli Nomani ends the discussion at this point. And of a work
dating back to 1901, we could hardly expect more. Modern research,
however, has opened up new vistas of events
and realities, so that we can now assert to a
certain extent that the permanent existence
of the soul, independent of the body, or the
survival of the soul after the death of the
body is no more a thing which involves blind
faith; rather it has become a reality which can
be empirically proved.
Personality is
changelessness in
change, that is, the
human personality
is self-existent (as
compared to the
body), keeping
its existence in
changeless form
amidst continuous
changes.
Science has discovered that the body is
composed of innumerable tiny cells. These
cells disintegrate each moment, but our diet
makes up for those destroyed cells and they
are replaced with new ones. The body is thus
like a building which is composed of billions
of bricks but which is in the process of replacing its bricks at every
moment. Now, if the soul is a phenomenon of the body, then with the
disintegration or changing of the cells of the body, the soul should
simultaneously undergo the same transformation, just as a whole
machine is affected when one part of it is broken, or as the breaking of a
single string affects the tone of a musical instrument. But such is not the
case with the soul. This shows that the soul is independent of the body
and has its own existence. This is why a scientist has said, “Personality
is changelessness in change,” that is, the human personality is self existent (as compared to the body), keeping its existence in changeless
form amidst continuous changes.
Further proof of the truth of this concept is provided by the discovery
in the field of psychology of the ‘unconscious’ or the ‘subconscious’—a
major part of the human brain. It has been established that the thoughts
stored in the unconscious remain in exactly the same condition until
death. Freud writes in his thirty-first lecture:
The laws of logic—above all, the law of contradiction, do not
hold for processes in the Id (inner nature). Contradictory
impulses exist side by side without neutralizing each other or
drawing apart; at most they combine
in compromise. There is nothing in the
Id, which can be compared to negation,
and we are astonished to find in it an
exception to the philosophers’ assertion
that space and time are necessary forms
of our mental acts. In the Id there is
nothing corresponding to the idea of time,
no recognition of the passage of time, and
(a thing which is very remarkable and
awaits adequate attention in philosophic
thought) no alteration of mental processes
by the passage of time. Cognitive impulses
which have never got beyond the Id, and even impressions which
have been pushed down into the Id by repression, are virtually
immortal and are preserved for whole decades as though they
had only recently occurred.
By means of various
experiments and
demonstrations,
it was shown that
even after bodily
death, the human
personality survives
in some mysterious
form.
The processes of the Id being independent of time shows that the
unconscious has its own independent existence; it has been established
that the body is subject to the laws of time and space and that it is in
space and time that all its actions take place. Now if the soul is simply
an extension of the body, then, like the body, it too should be subject
to the laws of time and space. Since observation has shown that this is
not so, there is the inevitable inference that the soul by its very nature
is something separate from (though not extraneous to) the body and
that it exists independently. The relation of the soul to the body is
not comparable to that of a machine and its movement, nor to that
of a musical instrument and the music it produces. Had there been
any basis for this comparison, the same laws, which apply to the body,
would have affected the soul.
A branch of modern psychology which makes an empirical study of
man’s supernatural faculties—psychical research—does establish the
existence of life after death at a purely observational level. What is
most interesting is that such research does not establish mere survival;
rather it establishes the survival of exactly the same personality—the
entity that was known to us before death.
Man has possessed many other analyzable traits right from the
very beginning, but it is only comparatively recently that they have
been analyzed scientifically. For instance, dreaming is one of the
oldest known activities of man. But ancient man was unaware of the
psychological relevance of dreams, the facts of which have come to
light only after recent scientific research. Even more interesting are
quite other manifestations of the human spirit, the recent facts and
figures of which give strong indications of the
existence of extra-sensory perception and of
the objects of this perception.
Facts strongly
suggest that the
universe, and the
human personality,
each have a
dimension additional
to the material one
so capably and
successfully explored
by the natural
sciences.
The first institution to conduct research in
this field was established in England in 1882.
It still exists today under the name of “Society
for Psychical Research.” It began its work on
a large scale in 1889 by contacting 17,000
people who were asked whether—when they
believed themselves completely awake—they
had ever had a vivid impression of seeing,
or being touched by a living being (who was
not actually there) or inanimate object which
moved apparently of its own volition or of
hearing a voice which, so far as they could
discover, was not due to any external physical cause. Many other
institutions from other countries conducted similar research and,
by means of various experiments and demonstrations, it was shown
that even after bodily death, the human personality survives in some
mysterious form.
In his book A Philosophical Scrutiny of Religion, C.J. Ducasse observes:
These facts strongly suggest that the universe, and the human
personality, each have a dimension additional to the material
one so capably and successfully explored by the natural sciences.
Many other scholars who have objectively examined the evidence
furnished by psychical research have felt compelled to accept the life Hereafter as a matter of fact. C. J. Ducasse (d. 1969), Professor
of Philosophy at the Brown University, has made a philosophical and
psychological scrutiny of this concept. He did not believe it in the sense
in which it is presented by religion, yet he held that apart from the
dogmas of religion, such evidence does exist that compels us to accept
the survival of life after death. After making a general survey of various
investigations in the field of research, he observed:
Some of the keenest-minded and best-informed persons, who
studied the evidence over many years in a highly critical spirit,
eventually came to the conclusion that, in some cases at least,
only the survival hypothesis remained plausible. Among such
persons may be mentioned Alfred Russel Wallace, Sir William
Crookes, F.W.H. Myers, Cesare Lombroso, Camille Flammarion,
Sir Oliver Lodge, Dr. Richard Hodgson, Mrs. Henry Sidwick and
Professor Hyslop, to name only a few of the most eminent.
This suggests that the belief in a life after
death, which so many persons have found
no particular difficulty in accepting as an
article of religious faith, not only may be
true but is perhaps capable of empirical
proof; and if so, that, instead of the
inventions of theologians concerning the
nature of the postmortem life, factual
information regarding it may eventually
be obtained.
The truth is that if life
survives after death,
there can be no
interpretation other
than a religious one.
That, in such a case, the content of this information will turn
out to be useful rather than not, for the two tasks which it
is the function of religion to perform, does not, of course,
automatically follow.
Ducasse, while accepting life after death as a reality, has refused to
accept the religious nature of this same phenomenon. This is only a
matter of his own personal predilections. The truth is that if life survives
after death, there can be no interpretation other than a religious
one.