THE CULTURE OF PEACE
Teachings of Islam
WHAT is Peace? Some scholars define peace as the absence of
war. This definition is, from the dictionary or literal point of
view, correct. If a society is free from violence and war, the
situation that prevails may be termed as ‘peace’. Whenever there is no
war or violence between individuals or groups, a state of peace begins
to emerge on its own.
However, for peace to be established in any society, it is not enough
that it has succeeded in ending violence or war. To define peace
as the absence of violence or war is a limited definition of peace. A
better way of defining peace is on the basis of the positive attributes
that characterise peace. Accordingly, a society can be said to enjoy
peace if positive and constructive thought and activity flourish among
its members.
The establishment of peace in a society can be likened to the lifting of
the gates of a dam, leading to a river being filled with plenty of water.
Life is like a flowing river that seeks to surge ahead, driven by its own
inner force. It stops its journey only when some artificial barrier is
placed in its path. In the absence of such a barrier, life flourishes in all
its dimensions, impelled by Nature.
A society can be said to enjoy peace if positive and
constructive thought and activity flourish
among its members.
Violence and war are barriers that seek to block the natural flow of life.
In contrast, peace opens up all the barriers that seek to impede life’s
onward journey.
We often talk of peace in the context of war. But this is a very narrow
and restricted notion of peace. The fact is that peace is deeply linked
with the whole of human life. Peace is a complete ideology in itself.
It is the master-key that opens the doors to every sort of success.
Peace creates a favourable atmosphere for success in every sort of
endeavour. Without peace, no positive action — small or big — is at
all possible.
Peace is the Religion of the Universe
The Quran tells us:
The sun cannot overtake the moon, nor can the night
outpace the day; each floats in [its own] orbit.
THE QURAN 36: 40
Referring to an astronomical phenomenon, this Quranic verse tells us
about the principle on which the system of the entire universe is based.
And this is the principle of peace. There are innumerable entities in the
cosmos, and all of them are in constant motion. Yet, they do not clash
with each other. Every entity in the cosmos carries on doing its own
work in its own orbit. None interferes in the sphere of the others. This
is why they never clash with each other.
This ‘culture of peace’ is also what human beings should imbibe. They
should base their lives on precisely the same universal principle that
conforms to the rest of the cosmos. This means they must abandon the
path of violence and confrontation and tread the path of peace.
The highest attribute of the God who has sent the Quran
is mercy, and this book is an expression of His mercy.
The culture of the cosmos is a ‘culture of peace’. It is because of this
peace that the cosmos has been functioning for millions of years and yet
has not witnessed any confrontation that has impaired its functioning.
If a ‘culture of violence’ had pervaded the cosmos, by now it would have
been devastated, and there would have been no possibility for human
life to exist.
The same Creator who made the rest of the cosmos has created us
human beings, too. The Creator wants that human beings should adopt
the very same ‘peace culture’ that He has established throughout the
rest of the vast cosmos. The only difference is that this ‘peace culture’
prevails in the rest of the cosmos on the basis of Nature, while humans
are independent creatures and have free will. And so, God wishes that
they should freely decide to adopt this ‘peace culture’ in their lives.
The Quran, a Book of Peace
The Quran is, without doubt, a book of peace. It is not a book of violence and war. All the statements of the Quran are, directly or indirectly,
related to peace. The very first phrase in the Quran is: Bismillah
ir-Rahman ir-Rahim, which means, ‘In the name of God, the Beneficent,
the Merciful.’ In other words, the highest attribute of the God who has
sent this book is mercy, and this book is an expression of this attribute
of His mercy.
All the verses of the Quran are, directly or indirectly, based on peace.
There are 6, 666 verses in the Quran. Of these, hardly 40 are about
commandments of qital or war — in other words, less than 1 per cent.
In fact, they amount to just around 0.6 per cent of the total number
of verses.
The culture of the cosmos is a ‘culture of peace’.
Those who regard the Quran as God’s Book can be considered to be
momins or true believers only when, abiding by the teachings of the
Quran, they become fully and completely peace-loving. Under no
conditions whatsoever should they take to the path of violence.
In this regard, one needs to stress the need for people to distinguish
between Islam, on one hand, and Muslims, on the other. They must not
label the actions or behaviour of Muslims as ‘Islamic’. The fact is that
the behaviour of Muslims must be judged on the basis of Islam; and not
Islam sought to be understood on the basis of Muslim behaviour. Islam
is an ideology. A person can be truly considered to be a Muslim only
if he follows the teachings of Islam. Those who do not follow Islam’s
teachings do not have anything to do with Islam, even if they claim to
be its champions.
Peace versus Violence
Peace is a well-planned effort or action, while violence is a passiondriven,
aggressive action. A peace-loving person thinks first and then
acts. On the contrary, a violence-loving person first acts and then
thinks, if at all. Peaceful action is based on hope, in the beginning as
well as at the end, while violent action is based on false hopes in the
beginning and frustration in the end.
A peace-loving person is established in truth. A violence-loving person
is established in falsehood. Peace and positive constructive work
go hand-in-hand, while violence is wholly destructive. Peace ends in success, and violence in utter failure. Peaceful action abides by the law,
while violent action is lawlessness.
A peace-loving person overlooks problems and uses the opportunities
available, while a violence-loving person ignores the opportunities
available and gets entangled in a useless battle against problems. The
path of peace cultivates a garden bursting with flowers, while the path
of violence creates a thorny jungle of hatred and enmity.
In peace, one fulfils the obligations one owes to God as well as those
one owes to God’s creatures, including other human beings. Violence,
on the other hand, is a violation of the ‘rights of God’ as well as the
rights of people. If peace is heaven, then violence, in comparison, is
sheer hell. Choosing peace is making the right choice. On the other
hand, if one chooses war, it proves that he has failed in the test of
making a choice.
The behaviour of Muslims must be judged on the basis of
Islam; and not Islam sought to be understood on the basis
of Muslim behaviour.
In this world, there are many things that are not desirable, but they
exist for the purpose of testing us — for instance, alcohol. Alcohol
exists not so that people should drink it, but, rather, so that they
should avoid it and thereby prove that they can distinguish between
good and bad. The same thing holds for war, too. War is something
that can be resorted to, but the right thing for human beings to do is
to desist from it.
In the ancient past, considering the then prevailing conditions,
permission was given for defensive war. This permission was in
accordance with the law of necessity. But now, in the changed conditions
of today, this necessity no longer exists. And that is why there is now
no need at all for war.
Reconciliation is Best
The Quran ( 4: 128 ) describes a particular natural law in the following
words: ‘Reconciliation is best’ (as-sulh khair). The word sulh means
reconciliation. In the event of a conflict between two parties, they can
engage in violent confrontation. But there is another method they can
choose: to immediately come to an agreement and end their conflict.
This is what reconciliation is about.
It is very rare for this sort of reconciliation to be equally in accordance
with the desires of both parties. In most cases, this reconciliation
happens on a unilateral basis. That is to say, one of the two parties
sets aside its desires and agrees to settle the dispute according to the
desires of the other party.
Why is this sort of unilateral reconciliation termed as ‘best’? The reason
for this is because a situation of conflict puts a halt to constructive
activity. The benefit of agreeing to reconciliation is that one is thereby
spared the need to waste one’s time, strength and resources on
useless confrontation and one can focus on constructive efforts
instead. A course of action that is opposed to reconciliation is always
and inevitably a course of destruction. The method of reconciliation is
always, and in every case, a beneficial one.
Those who do not follow Islam’s teachings do not have
anything to do with Islam, even if they claim
to be its champions.
History is witness to the fact that whenever people have attained any
kind of success following conflict, it has only been after adopting the
method of reconciliation. Not a single person has ever achieved any
real success through confrontation and fighting. The importance of
reconciliation lies in the fact that it provides an opportunity to fully
exercise one’s right to use the available opportunities. On the other
hand, the path of confrontation leads one to waste one’s energies in
trying to destroy others; as a result of which, one can engage in no
constructive work whatsoever. The secret of success lies in stabilising
and building up oneself, and definitely not in the destruction of
imaginary enemies.
No to ‘Corruption in the Land’
The Quran describes a certain form of behaviour in the following words:
When they are told, ‘Do not cause corruption in the land,’
they say, ‘We are only promoters of peace,’ […]
THE QURAN 2: 11
This Quranic verse refers to people who, on the face of it, are engaged in some reformist efforts but whose method is not proper. Their
method is such that, in actual practice, it causes fasad, or ‘corruption’
in the land. Here, ‘corruption in the land’ means that as a result of their
method, people start clashing with each other. Their method leads to
stirring up hatred between people, weakening their moral sensibilities
and engendering negative thinking. All these are forms of fasad fil ardh
or ‘corruption in the land’ which this Quranic verse talks about, because
they destroy social peace, leading to violence and confrontation.
All activities undertaken in the name of reform that
disturb social peace and cause loss of life
and property are wrong.
From this Quranic teaching we learn that for an action to be considered
proper, it is not enough that it appears to have started for a good
cause. In addition to this, it is necessary to keep in mind the sort of
results activities undertaken in the name of reform produce. If these
activities give birth to hatred, tension, violence and so on and so forth
amongst people, then, despite claiming to be reformist activities they
are definitely not so. Rather, they are destructive activities, leading to
fasad or ‘corruption’ in the land. Those who engage in such activities
should be considered criminals and enemies of humanity, and certainly
not reformers or servants of humanity.
An action can be considered a genuine reformist effort only if it is
carried out within the limits of peace and humaneness. All activities
undertaken in the name of reform that disturb social peace and cause
loss of life and property are wrong. Efforts in the name of reform must
also necessarily bring about true reform in terms of their results. If,
instead, they result in what the Quran refers to as fasad or ‘corruption’ in
the land, then they are actually themselves a form of fasad, irrespective
of the beautiful words used to describe them.
Ending Conspiracies
The Quran tells us:
If you persevere and fear God, their designs will
never harm you in the least.
THE QURAN 3: 120
This Quranic verse indicates a very important fact of life. The real issue for individuals or groups is not whether they might have enemies
who are conspiring against them. Rather, it is whether or not they
have sufficient sabr or patience and have adopted the necessary
precautionary measures to cause any conspiracies against them to fail.
If conspiracies can be likened to the rain, patience and God consciousness
are like a strong roof. Rain is a problem only for those who have
not bothered to make a firm roof over their heads.
Restrain yourselves from committing
excesses (ghulu) in religion.
The world runs on the principle of competition. And that is why it is but
natural that sometimes rivalries will develop between individuals and
groups, which may later assume the form of conspiracies against each
other. Whenever something like this happens, one should consider it
not as an enemy’s conspiracy but, rather, as an expression of a basic
law of Nature. To think of a conspiracy as an action of an enemy takes
one towards violence. In contrast, if one takes it to be a result of a basic
law of Nature, one will nurture a way of thinking that will lead one to
take wise measures to avoid falling prey to such conspiracies — just as
a wise man does not protest against the rain; but rather, builds a roof
over his house to save himself from getting wet.
No To Extremism
The Quran tells us:
Do not go to extremes in your religion.
THE QURAN 4: 171
The same point is made in a Hadith report, according to which the
Prophet declared:
‘You should restrain yourselves from committing excesses
(ghulu) in religion. For it was due to their having gone
to extremes in religion that the previous
communities were destroyed.’
This Hadith is recorded in the collections by Al-Nasai and Ibn Majah,
and in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad.
The same point is made in a Hadith report, according to which the The word ghulu means extremism. Ghulu or extremism in every matter
is wrong. It is the very antithesis of the essential spirit of religion.
Ghulu can easily escalate into violence and confrontation. Those who
have fallen prey to the psychological malady of ghulu refuse to accept
moderation. They scorn peace and moderation, thinking them to be
inferior, and that is why they are very easily attracted to violence. In the
name of attaining some lofty objective, they unleash deadly violence.
The opposite of ghulu or extremism is moderation. If you are moderate
in your thinking, you will think in terms of peace. All your efforts will
be through peaceful means. Moderation and peace are very closely
interlinked. Where there is moderation, there will be peace. Likewise,
where there is peace, there will be moderation.
In contrast, the ghulu-psyche always drags one towards extremism.
And extremism very easily turns into violence and confrontation. Ghulu
and violence are thus very closely linked. This is why ghulu in religion
is looked at with great disfavour in Islam. Inclination towards ghulu is
another name for addiction to violence. And abstaining from ghulu is
another name for cherishing moderation.
.....to be continued.
Keep your mind alive forever
It is a fact that intellectual discovery is the most thrilling experience.
A discovery made by Archimedes while he was bathing gave
him such a thrill that he leapt out of his bath,
shouting: Eureka! Eureka!
And such a thrill is great food
for the intellect.
This process staves off intellectual starvation,
thus making the discoverer permanently
alive and young.